ArticleBMC health services research2026
How patients navigate specialist referral pathways in hand surgery: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients navigating specialist care are often presented with multiple options and information sources. In fragmented healthcare systems, understanding how individuals select specialists is important for optimizing referral pathways and access to care. This study examined factors influencing patient selection of hand surgeons, including the relative importance of primary care recommendations, surgeon characteristics, online information (such as physician rating websites and internet-based search resources), opinions of family and friends, as well as demographic differences in these preferences.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey study was conducted among adults residing in New England. A 30-item online questionnaire was developed with input from hand surgeons and researchers and refined through pilot testing in lay participants. The survey was built in REDCap and distributed via ResearchMatch to 3,000 registrants, of whom 868 responded (response rate 28.9%). A total of 739 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Associations between demographic variables and factors influencing specialist selection were evaluated using chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for demographic covariates. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
resultsPrimary care physician (PCP) recommendation (26%) and internet-based resources (24%) were the most frequently reported methods for identifying a hand surgeon. 83% of respondents reported that a PCP recommendation influenced their specialist selection. Increasing age was independently associated with decreased importance attributed to online physician ratings (p < 0.0001), opinions of family and friends (p < 0.001), and insurance-related factors (p < 0.0001). Most respondents reported a preference for orthopedic practice settings (77%) and orthopedic training backgrounds (90%).
conclusionIn this survey, PCP recommendations were the strongest reported influence on specialist selection, with age-related differences in the importance of online and interpersonal information sources. These findings suggest that primary care plays a major role in reported pathways to specialty hand care and that communication strategies may need to be tailored to different demographic groups within healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.