ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Timing of height growth peaks and axial elongation in atropine-treated myopic children.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between systemic height growth rate and ocular axial elongation rate in atropine-treated children with myopia, and to explore whether the timing of height growth provides clinically relevant information regarding periods of axial elongation during treatment.
methodsChildren with myopia (< 15 years) who underwent serial ocular biometry and anthropometric measurements over ≥ 3 visits spanning > 1 year were included. Participants were classified into a control group (no atropine) and an atropine group (0.05% nightly, initiated for axial elongation ≥ 0.4 mm/year). Axial elongation and height growth rates were calculated for each inter-visit interval. Peak growth ages were defined as those with the greatest inter-visit changes. Subgroup analyses in the atropine group were based on the median peak height growth age (10.45 years) and median annual axial elongation rate (0.21 mm/year).
resultsA total of 139 eyes from 70 children were analyzed (56 control, 83 atropine-treated). Height growth rate and axial elongation rate were not significantly correlated in either group. In the control group, peak height growth age and peak axial elongation age showed similar unimodal distributions. In the atropine group, however, the distribution of peak height growth age showed a broadened pattern with marginal deviation from unimodality (P = 0.051) and associated strongly with peak axial elongation age (β = 0.91, P < 0.01). Children with earlier height growth peaks had greater annual axial elongation (0.27 ± 0.17 vs. 0.15 ± 0.12 mm/year; P < 0.01) despite identical dosing.
conclusionsAmong atropine-treated children, earlier systemic growth peaks were associated with faster axial elongation. Monitoring height growth timing may help identify rapid ocular growth periods and optimize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.