SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Temporomandibular joint disorders in dental students - a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of musculoskeletal conditions that may affect quality of life and functional performance. Dental students represent a population potentially at increased risk due to academic demands, psychosocial stress, and occupational strain; however, reported prevalence estimates and associated factors vary across studies.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence published between 2010 and 2024 on the prevalence of TMD among dental students and to examine reported associations with psychological stress, gender, and stage of dental education.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The search strategy combined controlled vocabulary (MeSH and Emtree terms) and free-text terms. Original quantitative studies involving dental students were included. Data extraction included study characteristics, diagnostic methods, prevalence estimates (n/N, %), and reported associations. Methodological quality was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Due to substantial heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and outcome measures, a qualitative synthesis was performed, with studies grouped according to diagnostic approach. Missing data were coded as "NA", and non-reportable prevalence values were indicated as "NR".
resultsA total of 23 studies were included. Reported prevalence of TMD ranged from 15.0% to 82.3%, reflecting differences in diagnostic methods and study designs. Studies using standardized diagnostic criteria (RDC/TMD or DC/TMD) generally reported lower prevalence estimates compared to those using self-reported instruments. Psychological stress was assessed in 15 out of 23 studies; however, reported associations with TMD were not consistent. Associations with gender were also inconsistently reported. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as low.
conclusionsTemporomandibular disorders are frequently reported among dental students; however, prevalence estimates vary considerably due to methodological heterogeneity. Reported associations with psychological stress and gender are inconsistent, and the predominantly cross-sectional design of included studies precludes causal inference. Future research should prioritize standardized diagnostic criteria, validated assessment tools, and longitudinal designs to improve comparability and strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.