ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Integrating AMMI, Bayesian-AMMI, BLUP, and GGE biplot models to improve the identification of high-yielding and stable barley genotypes.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe evaluation of genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) through multi-environment trials (METs) is an essential prerequisite in breeding improvement programs targeting wide adaptation. In this study, a panel of newly developed barley genotypes was examined under field conditions at five experimental sites across Iran's warm climatic zone during the 2023-2025 growing seasons.
resultsThe pooled analysis of variance clearly demonstrated that effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and GEI influenced all measured traits, including the number of days to heading (DH), days to physiological maturity (DM), grain filling period (GFP), plant height (PH), 1000-kernel weight (TKW), and grain yield (GY). Analytical outputs obtained from the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, as well as the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) approach, highlighted the substantial contribution of genotype × environment interaction to variation in grain yield. Insights from genotype-trait (GT) biplot analysis indicated that TKW and GFP were positively associated with GY. When genotypes were ranked using the multi-trait stability index (MTSI), G5 (1.689), G4 (1.914), G20 (2.380), and G14 (2.508) achieved the highest scores, reflecting superior performance and stability across test environments. A comprehensive evaluation strategy integrating classical AMMI, BLUP, Bayesian AMMI, and genotype-by-environment (GGE) biplot methodologies was employed to identify genotypes that combine productivity with stability. Across all derived stability parameters, including the weighted average of absolute scores (WAAS) and its yield-weighted counterpart (WAASY), genotype G4, derived from the pedigree [Sahra/3/Bda/Rhn-03//ICB-107766], consistently outperformed other candidates. This genotype exhibited a robust yield response, high stability, and broad environmental responsiveness. Independent validation using the stability Mahalanobis distance (SM) index and Y × WAASY biplot visualization further substantiated these findings.
conclusionIn conclusion, genotype G4 represents a strong candidate for subsequent validation trials and potential varietal release in the warm agroecological regions of Iran and other areas with comparable climatic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.