ReviewClinical proteomics2026
Nipple aspirate fluid as a proximal breast liquid biopsy platform: advancing precision risk management in breast cancer.
Review in Clinical proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of different MALDI-TOF-MS platforms for plasma IgG N-glycan profiling: impact on analytical performance and clinical conclusions.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent breast cancer (BC) risk management relies primarily on imaging and blood‑based liquid biopsies. However, these approaches are constrained by morphological blind spots, limited sensitivity for early lesions, and an inability to directly capture the biology of the ductal microenvironment where most tumors originate. There is a pressing need for novel strategies that provide direct, local insight into breast tissue risk. MAIN BODY: This review repositions nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) as a proximal, breast-specific liquid biopsy platform. Emerging evidence demonstrates that NAF, obtained by nipple aspiration from non-lactating breasts and not limited to cases of spontaneous nipple discharge, originates from a functionally autonomous ductal microenvironment and provides rich multi-omics information, including proteins, metabolites, epigenetic alterations, extracellular vesicles, inflammatory/oxidative mediators, microbiome-associated signals, and other local regulatory readouts, rather than simply representing a filtrate of blood. We summarize the biological foundations of NAF and its multi-omics landscape, highlighting its potential in three key clinical scenarios: (1) molecular risk stratification for pathologic nipple discharge, (2) individualized biological risk profiling in women with high-risk or dense breasts, and (3) proximal monitoring of treatment response and microenvironmental dynamics in patients with diagnosed BC.
conclusionAlthough standardization and prospective validation remain essential challenges, the development of robust collection protocols, integration of multi‑omics data, and execution of well‑designed clinical trials could enable NAF to shift BC management from a paradigm of "early detection" toward one of "precision risk insight and intervention," ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes and net benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.