SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2026
Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and meta-regression.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyroidectomy is a common surgical procedure associated with postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), which may impair early recovery and quality of recovery (QoR). Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has been proposed as a component of multimodal analgesia; however, its efficacy and safety in patients undergoing thyroidectomy remain uncertain. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative IV lidocaine in this population.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to Aug 13 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV lidocaine with placebo (normal saline) in adult patients undergoing thyroidectomy were included. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores at 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h. Secondary outcomes included quality of recovery (QoR) scores; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); use of antiemetics; duration of anaesthesia; total postoperative opioid consumption; and postoperative analgesia use. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method was applied when moderate or substantial heterogeneity was present (I² > 40%), whereas the DerSimonian and Laird (DL) method was used when heterogeneity was low to moderate (I² ≤ 40%).
resultsEleven RCTs involving 943 patients (121 males and 822 females; mean age 46.2 years; mean operative duration 84.4 min) were included. Overall, all outcomes were supported by moderate-certainty evidence, except for postoperative pain at 8 h, which was supported by low-certainty evidence. Postoperative pain scores were lower in the lidocaine group at time points (1, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h). At 24 h, pain outcomes favoured lidocaine (standardised mean difference [SMD] - 0.52, 95% CI - 1.01 to - 0.03; P = 0.0417; I² = 88.2%), and this benefit persisted at 48 h (SMD - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.68 to - 0.03; P = 0.0303; I² = 34.1%). Lidocaine significantly improved QoR on postoperative day 1 (MD 6.05, 95% CI 3.23 to 8.88; P < 0.0001; I² = 39.7%) and on day 2 (MD 6.52, 95% CI 4.97 to 8.06; P < 0.0001; I² = 0.0%). IV lidocaine significantly reduced the incidence of PONV compared with control (risk ratio [RR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.70; P = 0.0004; I² = 0.0%), while the requirement for rescue antiemetic therapy and the duration of anaesthesia did not differ significantly between groups.
conclusionIV lidocaine was associated with reduced postoperative pain scores, nausea and vomiting, as well as improved QoR in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. However, the relationship between statistical significance and clinical relevance varied across pain outcomes. Accordingly, the clinical relevance of the analgesic effect should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.