ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Primary site- and metastasis-directed therapies in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: A narrative review.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Impact of Immune-Inflammatory and Nutritional Indices in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) is primarily managed with systemic therapy based on androgen deprivation therapy, often combined with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors or chemotherapy. However, mPC is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease, ranging from low-volume or oligometastatic states with relatively favorable outcomes to widely disseminated disease associated with poor prognosis. In this context, primary site-directed therapy (PDT) and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) have emerged as complementary strategies for selected patients, aiming to address both local and metastatic disease control. PDT, including prostate radiotherapy and cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, may improve outcomes by reducing tumor burden and preventing local complications. Randomized evidence supports prostate radiotherapy in low-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive PC, although its survival benefit in the setting of intensified systemic therapy remains unclear. MDT, delivered via stereotactic body radiotherapy or metastasectomy, has demonstrated clinical benefit in oligometastatic diseases-particularly metachronous oligo-recurrence-by prolonging progression-free survival, delaying systemic treatment escalation, and potentially deferring castration resistance. In oligometastatic castration-resistant PC, early randomized studies suggest that combining MDT with systemic therapy may improve progression-related outcomes. Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography have enhanced lesion detection and patient selection, although they also complicate cross-trial comparisons. Despite these advances, high-level evidence demonstrating an overall survival benefit remains limited. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to clarify the optimal integration of PDT and MDT with contemporary systemic therapies and to better define appropriate patient selection. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence and explores future perspectives on incorporating local treatment strategies into mPC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42218356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.