Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Accuracy of Index Lymph Node Pathology in Predicting Overall Response to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Clinical Stage III Melanoma: Results From the Prospective NeoACTIVATE Arm C (NCT03554083) Substudy.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients with clinical stage III melanoma, a potentially surgically curable disease, neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves event-free survival. Substantial pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the affected nodal basin have raised interest in response-directed care including de-escalation of the extent of operation and adjuvant therapies. This study prospectively assessed the fidelity of index lymph node (ILN) pathology in predicting pathologic response across the entire nodal basin.
methodsThe ILN substudy was a preplanned prospective investigation within the multicenter NeoACTIVATE Arm C trial testing neoadjuvant doublet immunotherapy with atezolizumab and tiragolumab followed by therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND). Eligible patients had resectable clinical stage III nodal disease. Patients were required to have a sonographically visible clip placed in the ILN at diagnosis. Surgeons marked the ILN, which was assessed separately in addition to pathologic assessment of the entire nodal basin using International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium criteria.
resultsAmong 34 enrolled patients, 30 underwent TLND per protocol. Two patients (6.7%) demonstrated discordance between ILN and nodal basin pathology, both with a pCR in the ILN but residual disease in non-ILNs. The false-negative rate of an ILN pCR was 13.3%. Among eight patients with a single involved lymph node at baseline, the pathologic major response rate was 75% and concordance was 100%.
conclusionsIn this prospective substudy, ILN pathology did not fully reflect nodal basin status for all the patients. This finding supports caution in de-escalating treatment based solely on ILN response and highlight the need for prospective trials evaluating oncologic outcomes after limited nodal resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42218345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.