ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Percutaneous closure strategy in patients with patent foramen ovale and coexisting small atrial septal defect: a single-center experience.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) associated with cryptogenic stroke (CS), a small coexisting atrial septal defect (ASD) can serve as a potential source of residual shunting if not adequately addressed. We conducted a retrospective study of 14 patients with PFO and coexisting ASD who underwent transcatheter closure between December 2019 and May 2025. The first five patients treated with Amplatzer™ PFO Occluder demonstrated residual right-to-left shunting graded ≥ 3 at one-year follow-up. Following the introduction of the GORE® CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder (GSO) and GORE® CARDIOFORM ASD Occluder (GCA) in Japan, nine additional patients were treated. Among the eight patients who completed one-year follow-up, seven exhibited no significant residual right-to-left shunting (i.e., grade < 3). No recurrent strokes or device-related complications occurred in any of the 14 patients. This single-center study highlights the importance of appropriate device selection in managing PFO and coexisting ASD. In this anatomically complex subset, the use of GSO and GCA was associated with more favorable anatomical closure outcomes. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously in light of the limited number of cases and the non-comparative study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42218325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.