ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Cyclin E1 overexpression identifies a therapeutically relevant poor prognostic patient subgroup in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclin-E1 protein overexpression, including through CCNE1 gene amplification, is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and is a promising predictive marker for investigational therapies targeting cell-cycle checkpoints. However, the demonstration of its clinical utility remains elusive due to inconsistent definitions of protein overexpression and gene amplification. This study characterizes Cyclin-E1 overexpression and CCNE1 amplification prevalence and prognostic value in HGSOC using both original and public clinical cohorts. Fifty-nine percent of tumors overexpressed Cyclin-E1, more than half of which had no evidence of CCNE1 gene amplification. The prevalence of CCNE1 amplification varied across studies and was higher in interventional studies. Patients with Cyclin-E1 positive tumors had poorer outcomes after adjuvant therapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy increased Cyclin-E1 expression. These patients were less likely to benefit from PARP inhibitors (75% are BRCA-wildtype) or mirvetuximab-soravtansine (67% were not FRα-high), highlighting a distinct patient population in need of novel therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.