ArticleSpinal cord2026
Animal-assisted treatment in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a scoping review.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designScoping review.
objectivesAnimal-assisted treatment (AATx) has found application in the rehabilitation of individuals with neurophysiological conditions, such as spinal cord injury (SCI), to improve factors such as gait, respiratory function, and well-being. However, no overview of the scientific literature in this area currently exists. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to assemble all empirical studies concerning the use of AATx in the rehabilitation of individuals with SCI.
methodsSeven databases (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and CINAHL) were systematically searched for relevant studies. Via double-screening, eligible studies were required to be peer-reviewed, report original data, include adult participants ( ≥ 18 years) living with SCI, and evaluate an AATx intervention in a rehabilitation context. Data were double-extracted from all included studies.
resultsFrom 257 unique records screened, 10 studies were included per our eligibility criteria. Results were categorized according to intervention type. Five studies evaluated canine-assisted treatment interventions, finding reductions in such metrics as muscle activity, pushrim kinetics, and cardiovascular outcomes, although pain severity and interference were not significantly improved. Five studies evaluated equine-assisted treatment interventions, finding improvements in such outcomes as spasticity, weight distribution, and ankle range-of-motion, though long-term effects were contested.
conclusionsPreliminary findings suggest positive effects across a range of physiological and psychological outcomes, although some outcomes were not significantly improved or sustained. There is a need for more high-quality, longitudinal research and examples of AATx integrated into standard treatment in order to make recommendations for the use of AATx in SCI clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.