Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218311›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

MRI-based deep learning radiomics model for automated classification of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine.

Shiv Patil, Om H Gandhi, Mert Karabacak, Matthew T Carr, Konstantinos Margetis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shiv PatilSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Om H GandhiDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Mert KarabacakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States of America.
Matthew T CarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States of America.
Konstantinos MargetisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States of America. Konstantinos.Margetis@mountsinai.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disc degeneration in the lumbar spine is a major cause of low back pain (LBP). The accurate grading of disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical for clinical management and patient selection for spine surgery. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models that combine features from deep learning (DL) and radiomics for the automated prediction of Pfirrmann grade (PG), a measure of disc degeneration, using multi-parametric lumbar spine MRI. Sagittal T1, T2, and T2 SPACE MRIs of 218 patients with LBP were acquired from the SPIDER dataset. For each intervertebral disc and available sequence, 1218 3D radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics, and 2048 deep-learning features were obtained from a disc-centered midsagittal-slice region of interest using a frozen, ImageNet-pretrained ResNet50, yielding a fused per-disc vector of up to 9798 features. LASSO regression fit on the training set reduced this to 680 candidate features. Data were split at the patient level (60%/20%/20% train/validation/test), with no patient appearing in more than one split. Three ML models (TabPFN, LightGBM, and Random Forest) were trained, isotonically calibrated on the validation set, and evaluated on the held-out test set. Twelve supplementary analyses were additionally performed, including feature-family ablations, ordinal regression, class-weighted and logistic-regression baselines, calibration-method and calibration-depth analyses, shape-feature confounding, leave-one-scanner-out generalization, LASSO penalty sensitivity, decision curve analysis, a within-radiomics feature-category ablation, and operating-point sensitivity. Confidence intervals were computed by 500-iteration patient-level bootstrap. For multi-class (PG 1-5) prediction the three models achieved comparable performance: TabPFN reached a macro-averaged AUROC of 0.867 (95% CI: 0.822-0.904), AUPRC of 0.667 (95% CI: 0.586-0.735), F1 score of 0.621 (95% CI: 0.546-0.677), accuracy of 0.603 (95% CI: 0.538-0.676), MCC of 0.500 (95% CI: 0.410-0.587), and Brier score of 0.107 (95% CI: 0.092-0.123); LightGBM and Random Forest yielded essentially equivalent metrics (macro-AUROC 0.873 and 0.872, respectively). On the binary low- vs. high-grade task (PG 1-3 vs. 4-5) all three models reached AUROC ≥ 0.93 and accuracy of approximately 0.86, with the three models occupying different precision-recall operating points (TabPFN and Random Forest favoring precision; LightGBM balanced). 3D radiomic feature extraction combined with tabular ML classifiers supports automated classification of disc degeneration on multi-parametric lumbar spine MRI. Ablation analyses show that radiomic features carry essentially the entire signal, with frozen, ImageNet-pretrained ResNet50 features adding no measurable discriminative value. Performance is strongest at the extremes of the Pfirrmann scale and on the binary low- vs. high-grade distinction. Intermediate-grade discrimination remains challenging and warrants ordinal modeling and external validation. Radiomics also yields interpretable shape and intensity features that may serve as imaging biomarkers of disease.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingClassification AlgorithmsHumansLow Back PainPredictive Learning ModelsRadiomicsRandom ForestDeep learningDisc degenerationLumbar spineMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID42218311
PMCPMC13454629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.