Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218301›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Mapping the role of artificial intelligence in health-related stigma: a scoping review.

Tianqi Song, Jack Jamieson, Wataru Akahori, Han Meng, Shuqi Wang, Yi-Chieh Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianqi SongNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jack JamiesonNTT, Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru AkahoriNTT, Tokyo, Japan.
Han MengNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Shuqi WangNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yi-Chieh LeeNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. yclee@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore A-8002610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stigma remains a major barrier to equitable health and well-being, while artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a tool with both potential and risk in addressing this challenge. However, research on AI and stigma is fragmented across disciplines, hindering a unified understanding of their intersection. To consolidate existing evidence, we conducted a scoping review of 11,769 records published between 2016 and 2025 and identified 70 studies examining the relationship between AI and health-related stigma. Four research themes emerged: AI measuring stigma (n = 42, 60%), stigma influencing AI use (n = 15, 21%), AI increasing stigma (n = 9, 13%), and AI reducing stigma (n = 4, 6%). Most studies focused on mental health disorders, revealing an imbalance in attention to other health conditions. Across studies, we observed inconsistent definitions of stigma, limited cross-cultural perspectives, and few evaluations of real-world AI applications. Addressing these gaps will be critical for developing responsible and equitable AI systems that mitigate rather than reinforce health stigma across broader societal and health contexts.

Identifiers

PMID42218301
PMCPMC13518983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.