ArticleScientific reports2026
Soil health and economic evaluations of direct seeded rice through metabolomic and biochemical fingerprinting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was conducted for three consecutive cropping seasons from 2020-2022 in Amritsar of Punjab with the objective to analyze the soil health and economic impact of direct seeded rice (DSR) technology over puddled transplanted rice (PTR). It was recorded high number of average earthworm count in the soil sample of DSR fields (Mean value 124.6) as compared to PTR fields (Mean value 68). The soil health was also improved through DSR technique as various physical parameters i.e. porosity, bulk density & water holding capacity observed better in DSR fields over PTR technique. The soil samples of DSR fields also showed high amount of NPK (N: 219, P: 816, K, 101.4) and mineral content (Mg: 1298, Ca: 1336, Zn: 4.85, Mn: 87.5, Cu: 8.51 & Fe; 9.92) as compared to PTR fields. It was also observed that soil sample of DSR field showed improved carbon composition (HAs, FPA, GRSPs, WSOC, HWSOC, EE) & soil enzymatic activity (DHA, ALK, ACP & PMN) as compared to PTR soil sample. The various reproductive, photosynthetic, and yield parameters of rice crops was observed improved in DSR over the PTR. The HPLC-MS based fingerprinting showed up-regulation of amino acid and phenolics in rice grains grown through DSR technique over the PTR. The cost of field preparation and tillage was reduced by 62.15% in DSR over PTR. The DSR technology resulted into yield improvement by 3.44-18.21% as compared to transplanted rice. A net profit of 13.91-31.62% was calculated in DSR over PTR technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.