Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218261›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Automated leukemia detection from microscopic images using deep transfer learning with explainable AI-based analysis.

Md Ashikuzzaman, Mir Md Julhash, Md Feroz Ali, Md Shafiul Alam, Mohammad Ali, Imil Hamda Imran, Obaidullah Obaidi, Md Kamrul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md AshikuzzamanDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Pabna, 6600, Bangladesh.
Mir Md JulhashDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Pabna, 6600, Bangladesh.
Md Feroz AliDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Pabna, 6600, Bangladesh. feroz071021@gmail.com.
Md Shafiul AlamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia. shafiul@kfu.edu.sa.
Mohammad AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Imil Hamda ImranDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Obaidullah ObaidiDepartment of Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul, 1006, Afghanistan. obaidullah.obaidi@ku.edu.af.
Md Kamrul IslamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Faisal University KFU261717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leukemia, a life-threatening hematological malignancy, necessitates early and accurate diagnosis for effective treatment. Traditional microscopic examination is often time-consuming and subjective, while most existing deep learning-based studies are limited to a narrow selection of models and lack interpretability analysis. To address these gaps, this study presents a comprehensive comparative evaluation of fourteen pre-trained CNN architectures, including EfficientNetB1/B3/B5, Xception, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet201, ResNet variants, VGG16/19, and MobileNet, for automated leukemia detection from microscopic blood smear images. A publicly available Kaggle dataset containing 10,700 labeled images with variations in staining intensity, cell morphology, and image resolution was used. The dataset was divided into training (70%, 7500 images), validation (15%, 1600 images), and testing (15%, 1600 images) subsets using stratified sampling to preserve class balance. To ensure statistical robustness, all experiments were repeated ten times with different random seeds, and performance metrics are reported as mean values, with pairwise McNemar's tests applied to validate the significance of observed differences (p < 0.05). EfficientNetB1, EfficientNetB5, Xception, and ResNet50 achieved test accuracies of up to 96%, recall up to 98%, F1-scores up to 97%, and AUC values up to 0.987, indicating excellent threshold-independent discriminative capability. Explainable AI techniques, specifically Grad-CAM and LIME, were integrated to enhance transparency and clinical trustworthiness. Comparative analysis demonstrates competitive or superior performance against recent state-of-the-art methods, providing preliminary evidence toward future clinical translation. However, the study is limited by reliance on a single publicly available binary-class dataset, which constrains generalizability across imaging devices, staining protocols, and clinical sites; external validation on independent multi-center datasets is therefore identified as a primary direction for future work.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLeukemiaMicroscopyConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansConvolutional neural networks (CNNs)Deep learningLeukemia detectionMicroscopic image analysisTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42218261
PMCPMC13454600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.