Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42218250›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2026

Sensor wide association studies in digital medicine.

Nico Steckhan, Felix Broghammer, Dylan Powell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nico SteckhanDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. nico.steckhan@hpi.de.
Felix BroghammerDepartment for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Department of Medicine III, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Dylan PowellFaculty of Health Sciences & Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Research, Technology, Space 16KISA100K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assoziation studies revolutionized genomics by rigorously screening large feature sets against health outcomes. Digital medicine now produces similarly high-dimensional, longitudinal sensor data from wearables, smartphones, and connected environments. We propose Sensor-Wide Association Studies (SWAS): structured, feature-wide, hypothesis-generating scans of a pre-specified library of sensor-derived features against one or more pre-defined clinical phenotypes, with transparent feature documentation, appropriate longitudinal modeling, and principled control of multiplicity. This perspective outlines minimal standards, common failure modes, and ethical considerations to help SWAS become a reproducible foundation for digital epidemiology and personalized medicine.

Identifiers

PMID42218250
PMCPMC13222335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.