ArticleScientific reports2026
An accurate, efficient, and accessible AI-powered solution for wildlife re-identification in conservation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential weighting of lion vocalizations and oxpecker alarm calls in giraffes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate wildlife re-identification is critical for a wide range of ecological studies, including density estimation via capture-recapture, demographic analyses, and behavioral research. We pr esent GIRAFFE (Generalized Image-based Re-identification using AI for Fauna Feature Extraction), a system for automated re-identification of giraffes with extensibility to other species. Our approach uses local feature matching to identify known individuals and partition unknown individuals for label annotation at scale. Further, we develop a user interface that enables both technical and non-technical users to curate large datasets and analyze repeat survey data. In contrast with existing methods that require manual labeling to facilitate individual re-identification, GIRAFFE automates key steps in the re-identification pipeline, reducing manual effort while maintaining accuracy and interpretability. Validated on real-world giraffe datasets, the system achieves over 0.9 accuracy across nine standard metrics, with some metrics achieving near perfect score. It runs 120 times faster than baseline methods and delivers a 132-fold improvement in cost-effectiveness. This supports endangered species tracking, improves analysis of population dynamics and movement patterns, and, ultimately, allows for the implementation of data-driven conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.