ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrated hydrogeochemical assessment and groundwater quality mapping for irrigation suitability and health risk in Kandahar City, Afghanistan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates groundwater quality in Kandahar City, Afghanistan, integrating hydrogeochemical characterization with water quality index (WQI), irrigation suitability assessment, and health risk zoning approaches. Groundwater is a critical drinking-water and irrigation resource in hard-rock aquifers, where quality is governed by complex rock-water interactions and can vary markedly across space. This study integrates hydrogeochemical characterization with a decision-oriented water-quality assessment to evaluate groundwater suitability for domestic consumption and agricultural use. Eighty groundwater samples were analyzed, and drinking-water quality was quantified using a Water Quality Index (WQI), complemented by irrigation hazard diagnostics including sodium percentage (Na%), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), permeability index (PI), Kelly's ratio (KR), and magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR). Spatial heterogeneity in groundwater quality was mapped using two interpolation approaches-Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Ordinary Kriging-to contrast localized versus regional patterns and to identify priority zones for intervention. WQI classification indicates that most samples fall within the Excellent (38.75%) and Good (32.5%) categories, whereas 28.75% of samples are Poor to Undrinkable (15% Poor, 6.25% Very Poor, and 7.5% Undrinkable), highlighting discrete hotspots of degraded quality. Irrigation suitability is generally favorable, with uniformly low SAR (0-6.24; mean 0.91) and KR < 1 for all samples, while localized constraints are indicated by PI and MAR, and by elevated RSC in a subset of samples. A WHO-guideline exceedance-based health risk screening indicates that key concerns are associated with elevated total hardness (48.33% exceedance) and elevated chloride and TDS (40% each), with additional exceedances observed for sulphate (38.33%). Collectively, the findings demonstrate that coupling hydrogeochemical interpretation with WQI-based classification, irrigation indices, and geostatistical mapping provides an actionable framework for prioritizing treatment in high-risk zones, guiding safe allocation of sources for drinking, and sustaining agricultural water use through targeted management measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.