ArticleScientific reports2026
Freezing depth prediction of surrounding rock in seasonally frozen tunnels based on bayes-optimized XGBoost.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During freeze-thaw cycles, frost heave forces induced by pore water phase transition in the surrounding rock of seasonally frozen tunnels act continuously on the lining structure, impairing its stability and service performance. The evolution of freezing depth is governed by the coupling effects of temperature, moisture and surrounding rock properties, and directly correlates with the distribution of frost heave forces. Thus, accurate prediction of freezing depth is critical for frost heave disaster control and structural design of cold-region tunnels. In this study, moisture migration and phase transition during surrounding rock freezing were considered to establish a hydrothermal coupling model and identify key influencing factors. On this basis, a dataset of tunnel freezing depth in seasonally frozen regions was constructed by combining Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) with numerical simulation methods. Subsequently, a Bayes-optimized XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) prediction model was constructed, where Bayesian optimization (BO) was employed for hyperparameter tuning. Distinguished from traditional manual or grid search methods, this algorithm realizes automatic and precise parameter optimization with higher efficiency, and effectively avoids the model from falling into local optimality during the tuning process. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to quantify feature contributions, and the Stefan solution verified prediction reliability. Results show that BO-XGBoost outperforms Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), with high sensitivity to temperature, moisture and thermal conductivity properties but low sensitivity to specific heat properties. Increased thermal conductivity of surrounding rock and lining deepens the predicted freezing depth, while higher specific heat capacity, initial moisture content, initial rock temperature and average temperature of the coldest month reduce it. The maximum relative error between model predictions and field monitoring data is only 7.9%, significantly lower than the 22.4% of the Stefan solution, providing a more accurate method for predicting the freezing depth of seasonally frozen tunnels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.