ArticleScientific reports2026
Determinants of protein corona adsorption and abundance revealed by interpretable machine learning across nanoparticle systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) hold significant potential in biotechnology, including molecular sensing, controlled release systems, and therapeutic applications. However, their behavior in biological environments remains difficult to predict because proteins rapidly absorb onto NP surfaces, forming a protein corona (PC) that reshapes their surface properties and determines their biological identity, transport, and cellular interactions. In this study, we developed large-scale deep neural network (DNN) models to predict both protein adsorption (binary classification) and relative protein abundance (regression) on NP surfaces. We utilized a well-curated and comprehensive PC dataset comprising data from 83 peer-reviewed studies, 817 NP-PC samples, and 2,497 proteins, substantially expanding the scale and diversity compared with prior studies. Then, we employed a prevalence-based filtering strategy to mitigate sparsity and batch noise and trained over 200 machine learning models across proteins. The adsorption classification models achieved high discriminative performance (AUC = 0.96), while the abundance models achieved a pooled R² of 0.67 and an average per-protein R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.