ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of the first myasthenia gravis patient registry in Latvia: a single-centre experience.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study describes the development of Latvia's first myasthenia gravis (MG) patient registry in a single-centre setting. Adults with confirmed MG were recruited between January 2022 and May 2025 at Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and patients were assessed using the MGFA Clinical Classification, MG Composite (MGC), MG-ADL, MGQOL15, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Data were stored in a secure digital registry. A total of 112 patients were enrolled (62/107 (55%) female, from the available data; mean age 57.2 years), with 523 visits recorded. Median disease duration was 4.5 years. Antibody profiles were 76% AChR, 4% anti-MuSK, and 6% seronegative, with 14% missing data. At baseline, 25% of patients were in remission; after a median follow-up of 1.3 years (IQR 0.8-1.9 years), remission increased to 34%, while MGFA classes III-IV declined from 19 to 2%. Median MGC, MG-ADL, and MGQOL15 scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). FSS improved modestly (45.5 → 42.0, p = 0.049), 50% reported relevant fatigue. Median prednisone dose decreased from 15.0 to 7.5 mg (p < 0.001). The registry demonstrates the feasibility of structured longitudinal data collection in MG, with clinical improvement observed during follow-up, although fatigue remains a persistent burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.