Trial reportJournal of pain and symptom management2026
Pilot Randomized Trial of a Supportive Care Intervention for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Trial report in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextMultimodality therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is lengthy, complex, and overwhelming for patients to navigate. We developed "PATHWAYS," an informational and supportive care intervention tailored to patients initiating multimodality therapy for LARC.
objectivesWe sought to assess the feasibility and acceptability of PATHWAYS, and to refine the intervention based on patient feedback.
methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among patients initiating multimodality therapy for LARC. We randomized participants 1:1 to receive PATHWAYS (an educational guide plus four behavioral coaching sessions) or enhanced usual care (a curated list of online resources). Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, six, and 12 weeks, and in-depth interviews at six and 12 weeks to elicit feedback on study participation. The primary outcome was feasibility (60% of eligible patients enroll; 60% of PATHWAYS participants complete the intervention). The secondary outcome was acceptability (80% of PATHWAYS participants report satisfaction using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8).
resultsAmong 34 eligible patients approached, 20 (59%) enrolled (mean age 56.8 years, 50% women, 75% non-Hispanic White). Of the 10 patients randomized to PATHWAYS, nine (90%) completed the intervention, all (100%) of whom found the intervention acceptable. In qualitative interviews, participants reported using the PATHWAYS guide to enhance knowledge and the coaching sessions to make learning more manageable and tailored to their needs.
conclusionIn this pilot randomized controlled trial, we demonstrated high engagement and acceptability of a novel supportive care intervention for patients with LARC. Study results will guide refinements to the PATHWAYS intervention and future study procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.