ArticlePhysiology & behavior2026
Developmental alcohol exposure alters domains of executive function in rodents.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developmental alcohol exposure: Impacts on medial prefrontal cortex morphology and the excitatory-inhibitory balance.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Both prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) and adolescent alcohol exposure (AAE) persistently impair executive function in humans and animal models. Executive function encompasses multiple interrelated domains including working memory, inhibitory control, and behavioral flexibility. We hypothesized that a developmental "double hit" of PAE and AAE would produce more severe behavioral deficits associated with these executive domains compared to alcohol-naïve and single-exposed animals. We tested this hypothesis in rats by assessing disinhibition (low-light elevated plus maze; LL-EPM), behavioral flexibility (attentional set shift test; ASST), and working memory (spontaneous alternations in a T-maze); we also tested behavioral flexibility (ASST) in mice. Pregnant Sprague Dawley rats received water or 5 g/kg alcohol from gestational day (GD)13.5-GD20.5, and offspring received water or 5 g/kg alcohol on a 2-day-on, 2-day-off paradigm from postnatal day (PD)25 to PD54. Pregnant C57BL/6J mice received water or 4.5 g/kg alcohol from GD13.5-GD17.5, and offspring received water or 4.5 g/kg alcohol on a 2-day-on, 2-day-off paradigm from PD25 to PD42. Offspring underwent behavioral testing in young adulthood. Double hit rats showed more exploration in the LL-EPM than controls, suggesting deficits in disinhibition. Double hit rats and mice exhibited more errors and/or more trials to criterion in the ASST, indicative of decreased behavioral flexibility. Overall, double hit animals showed altered performance on tests related to executive function, suggesting that the combined exposure alters executive function in a manner distinct from single-exposure models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.