ReviewEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape2026
Beyond Broca and Wernicke: Epilepsy surgery in the language areas.
Review in Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy surgery in language areas is challenged by the intricacies of presurgical workup and surgical planning. In recent decades, the view of language-related circuitry has shifted from being localized in a few cortical centers to a distributed, dynamically interconnected system, increasing complexity. In this framework, neuropsychology, functional neuroimaging and neurophysiological assessments play an essential role in minimizing the risk of language deficits. A comprehensive preoperative neuropsychological assessment is essential for providing a baseline against which to compare postoperative performance, as well as for helping to define functional deficit and epileptogenic zones. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) represents a fundamental noninvasive alternative to the traditional Wada test for determining hemispheric language lateralization and localization. Resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) may offer a compelling alternative, particularly in populations where task performance is difficult or unreliable. The role of Stereo-electroencephalography (Stereo-EEG) and the intracerebral electrical stimulations (ES) is pivotal for both the identification of the epileptogenic zone and the mapping of eloquent cortices. The use of all available cortical stimulation methods, combined with test batteries targeting different language subdomains and designed to avoid the induction of post-discharges, appears to be the optimal approach for maximizing patient safety. The preservation of language function also relies on highly specific intraoperative mapping techniques, primarily employed in cooperative patients during awake craniotomy. Likewise, cortico-cortical evoked potentials could represent a valuable "task-free" neurophysiological alternative. Surgical strategies involving language areas vary from focal resections to larger lobar, multilobar or hemispheric procedures. Minimally invasive options such as Stereo-EEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have broadened therapeutic possibilities. Selection depends on EZ accessibility and extent. Modern epilepsy surgery within language-eloquent areas increasingly relies on integrated multimodal approaches. Future directions include the use of machine learning to analyze large postoperative datasets and predict long-term functional and seizure outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.