ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Understanding Physician Referral for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor t-cell (CAR T) therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with various types of leukemia and lymphoma, yet little is known about oncologists' attitudes, knowledge, and referral patterns for this therapy. Our goal was to identify potential gaps in Florida oncologists' attitudes, knowledge, and referral patterns for CAR T in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma, primary mediastinal b-cell lymphoma, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncologists and Hematologists in Florida were identified from the American Medical Association's Physician Masterfile (n=771) and invited to complete a survey measuring attitudes and knowledge about CAR T and referral patterns between August 2020-October 2020. We received 67 completed surveys (10% response rate). Results were quantified using descriptive statistics. Of those who completed surveys, physicians in our study indicated moderate confidence in CAR T efficacy (49.2%), toxicity (53.8%), and indications (60%). Physicians reported frequently discussing CAR T with patients (59.4%) and indicated experiencing patient concerns about safety/toxicity of CAR T (31.7%) and concerns about cost/insurance coverage (39.7%). Educational materials are not frequently utilized by physicians when discussing CAR T with patients; 73% indicated they never/rarely have materials available at clinic visits. Our study is among the first to assess oncologist's attitudes, knowledge, and referral patterns of CAR T therapy for patients with diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma. Efforts are needed to educate community oncologists about CAR T and develop educational materials for patients to aid in decision making about CAR T therapy and improve physician confidence and referral patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42217135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.