Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42217025›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2026

Genomic and clinical determinants of outcome in Irish AML: a real-world analysis (2007-2025), single centre experience.

Ezzat Elhassadi, Ellen O'Rourke, Ahmed Bannaga, Senthil Kumar, Brain Hennessy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ezzat ElhassadiDepartment of Haematology, Royal College Of Surgeons Ireland, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland. ezzatelhassdi@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-1130
Ellen O'RourkeDepartment of Haematology, Royal College Of Surgeons Ireland, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Ahmed BannagaDepartment of Haematology, Royal College Of Surgeons Ireland, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Senthil KumarDepartment of Haematology, Royal College Of Surgeons Ireland, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Brain HennessyDepartment of Haematology, Royal College Of Surgeons Ireland, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a genetically heterogeneous malignancy in which cytogenetic and molecular features critically inform diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making. While traditional karyotyping has long guided risk stratification, high-throughput sequencing has revealed extensive molecular diversity, particularly within cytogenetically normal AML, reshaping AML classification and management. This study characterises the genomic landscape and clinical outcomes of an Irish AML cohort using integrated cytogenetic and molecular profiling. We retrospectively analysed 166 adult AML patients diagnosed at our cancer centre between 2007 and 2025. Demographic, clinical, cytogenetic, molecular, and treatment data were collected. Karyotype-based and ELN 2022/2024 molecular classifications were applied. Survival analyses were performed using Prism v10.06, with statistical significance assessed using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Mutation frequencies were compared with published literature, and genomic subgroups were examined for prognostic impact. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 24-92), with 68% de novo AML, 19% secondary AML, 10% therapy-related AML, and 3% APL. Of 126 treated patients, 72 received intensive therapy and 53 received less-intensive regimens. CR rates were 75% in the intensive cohort versus 36% in the less-intensive cohort. Karyotyping (available in 87%) revealed 47% with normal cytogenetics, favourable risk in 5% and 30% with adverse-risk features. Molecular profiling identified ELN 2022 adverse-, intermediate-, and favourable-risk categories in 42%, 47%, and 7% of intensively treated patients; in the less-intensive cohort, adverse risk predominated (87%). TP53 mutations occurred in 8% of the entire cohort. Median OS and PFS were 19 and 11 months, respectively. Younger age (<65 years), favourable / intermediate cytogenetics, de novo AML, favourable / intermediate-risk ELN 2022 classification, and TP53 wild-type status were associated with significantly superior survival (all P < 0.05). Intensive therapy conferred marked survival benefit (median OS 32 vs 9 months; HR 0.35, P < 0.0001). ELN 2024 risk groups did not discriminate survival in the less-intensive cohort. TP53 mutations were associated with significantly inferior OS (median 12 vs 23 months; P = 0.008). This single-centre study demonstrates a heterogeneous genomic landscape in Irish AML patients, with mutation frequencies broadly consistent with international datasets but with notable enrichment of adverse-risk disease in older and less-intensively treated populations. Integrated cytogenetic and molecular profiling strongly predicted outcomes, while age, treatment intensity, and TP53 status emerged as dominant prognostic factors. These findings highlight the critical value of comprehensive genomic assessment to guide stratified AML management within the Irish population.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGenomicsHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAMLELN risk stratificationKaryotypingMolecularTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42217025
PMCPMC13433418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.