ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Timing of Indwelling Catheter Removal and its Impact on Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Prolapse Surgery.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPostoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication in prolapse surgery patients. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for postoperative indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) removal. To provide effective and evidence-based healthcare, we compare same-day midnight removal with IUC removal the morning after surgery.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 602 patients who underwent prolapse surgery between January 2020 and September 2023 were included. In the early removal group (n = 309), the IUC was removed at midnight on the day of the surgery; in the late removal group (n = 293), it was removed the following morning. Information regarding risk factors for POUR and discharge time was retrieved and analyzed.
resultsNo differences regarding the risk of POUR were found between the early and late removal groups OR 1.05 (95% CI 0.68, 1.60). An increased Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), stage III and IV prolapse, longer surgery time, spinal anesthesia, and pain are considered independent risk factors for POUR; a higher body mass index (BMI) reduces the risk of POUR. Patients diagnosed and treated for urinary retention had a significantly higher chance of developing urinary tract infections during recovery. Patients within the early removal groups were discharged approximately 9 h earlier.
conclusionsMidnight removal of the IUC after prolapse surgery does not lead to an increased incidence of POUR and is considered a safe alternative for catheter removal the following morning. In addition, this may contribute to more effective healthcare and optimization of hospital capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42217016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.