ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with blast phase myelofibrosis: molecular signature and intensive chemotherapy matter.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms have dismal outcomes, but allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) may offer a potential cure. However, the optimal pre-transplant blast-reduction therapy remains to be determined. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in a molecularly annotated cohort of 24 patients with BP myelofibrosis (MF) who underwent alloHSCT between 2008 and 2023. Before conditioning, 20 patients received intensive induction chemotherapy, 1 received decitabine plus venetoclax, and 3 proceeded directly to transplant. At transplantation, 13 patients (54%) were in complete remission (CR), defined as bone marrow blast < 5%, or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), while 11 (46%) had active disease. The median follow-up was 2.9 years (range 0.02-15.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 62%, progression-free survival (PFS) was 49%, relapse incidence was 38%, and non-relapse mortality was 12%. There was a trend toward better OS and PFS in patients transplanted in CR/CRi compared with those with active disease (OS 68% vs. 55%, HR 0.42, p = 0.16; PFS 61% vs. 36%, HR 0.49, p = 0.21). Mutations in TP53 and EZH2 were associated with significantly inferior PFS (HR 6.28, p = 0.008 for TP53 and HR 3.8, p = 0.04 for EZH2).Compared with a historical cohort of 50 patients transplanted during the same period for chronic-phase MF, outcomes were similar (3-year OS: 62% vs. 58%; p = 0.6181). In conclusion, our results suggest that achieving remission before alloHSCT in BP-MF is associated with favorable outcomes. The adverse impact of TP53 or EZH2 mutations supports early post-transplant strategies to prevent relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.