ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Incident learning systems to improve patient safety in nuclear medicine across Europe: results of the MARLIN study.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo enhance patient safety in nuclear medicine (NM) across Europe by operationalising MARLIN recommendations for implementing incident learning systems (ILSs), including barriers/enablers and practical implementation guidance.
methodsA mixed‑methods study (combining a survey, semi‑structured interviews, and a targeted literature review) was performed within the MARLIN project. This was a 24‑month initiative conducted under the European Commission's Strategic Agenda for Medical Ionising Radiation Applications (SAMIRA) Action Plan, involving European organisations such as EANM, EIBIR, ESTRO, and EFOMP. Surveys were distributed to Clinical Facilities (CFs), Competent Authorities (CAs), and professional societies (PSs). Interviews were used to explore implementation barriers and examples of good practice. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
resultsThe study revealed significant variability in the criteria for defining and reporting significant radiation events in NM across Europe. While all surveyed countries had designated authorities for managing reported events, only 11/23 had specific criteria for NM. The study identified key enablers and barriers to ILS implementation, including the need for a just culture to encourage reporting without fear of punitive measures. The guidelines recommended criteria for significant radiation events in NM and the organisation of ILSs.
conclusionThe MARLIN study provides a comprehensive framework for the systematic implementation of ILSs in NM, highlighting the importance of standardised reporting criteria in several categories, multidisciplinary involvement, and a culture of safety. Addressing the identified barriers and promoting a coordinated effort among stakeholders are crucial for enhancing patient safety in NM across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42216972What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.