ReviewThe Journal of investigative dermatology2026
Uveal melanoma: A review of current treatment limitations and the emerging therapeutic potential of natural killer cells.
Review in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy, contributing to ∼5% of all melanomas. It arises from melanocytes in the uveal tract (choroid, ciliary body, and iris) and has a specific genetic and clinical profile. Important genetic alterations shown to drive UM pathogenesis and influence prognosis include GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1, SF3B1, and EIF1AX. In addition, monosomy 3 and 8q gains are strongly linked to poor outcomes, whereas disomy 3 and 6p gains are associated with better prognosis. Approximately half of patients with UM develop metastases, most commonly to the liver, leading to high mortality. Conventional chemotherapy has shown poor efficacy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated only modest benefits. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, particularly in the liver, further limits treatment efficacy. NK cells offer a promising avenue to treat patients owing to their ability to recognize tumor cells independent of major histocompatibility complex. However, UM employs multiple immune evasion strategies, including the upregulation of HLA-E and the secretion of immunosuppressive factors inhibiting NK cell function. Despite these barriers, preclinical studies demonstrate that activated NK cells can reduce hepatic metastases. Emerging NK cell-based therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor-engineered NK cells and NK cell engagers, could provide an effective therapeutic strategy to treat metastatic UM, warranting further clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.