ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Promoting sexual and reproductive health in development and governance priorities for youth in Nepal: a qualitative exploration using reproductive justice framework.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This qualitative study explores the perceptions of promoting sexual and reproductive health (SRH) as a priority in development and governance among youth in Nepal. Despite progressive national frameworks supporting gender equality and SRH, the SRH indicators and ground reality suggest a pressing need for improved commitment to ensuring safe and quality SRH services. Using a reproductive justice lens, the study engaged 105 diverse participants including youth leaders, former youth leaders, donors, and local government officials through in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions conducted across all seven provinces of Nepal. While youth-led initiatives demonstrate promising efforts in policy advocacy, and digital engagement, they often encounter systemic and institutional hurdles like tokenism, policy exclusion, limited funding; and socio-cultural barriers such as deep-seated social stigma, and lack of inclusive programming. These barriers disproportionately impact marginalized groups, including sexual and gender minorities, persons with disabilities, and Dalit and Madheshi communities. To enable real progress in promoting SRH, this study identified a shift away from existing top-down approaches towards localized and decentralized strategies fostering youth agency, co-creation, and co-ownership of programs along with local governments, mainstreaming gender, and decentralizing resources and power for effective SRH promotion strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.