ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2026
Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this article, we introduce a Phase I clinical trial design that utilizes late-onset toxicity outcomes to determine group-specific doses when groups are partially ordered before the trial. By "partially ordered groups," we mean that the frailty order is known between some, but not all, groups. Previous research has addressed dose finding for partially ordered groups and for late-onset toxicity separately, but no solution has been proposed for dose finding that incorporates both aspects simultaneously.
methodsMotivated by a Phase Ib study involving heterogeneous groups with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, we extend the continual reassessment method shift model framework to tackle the problem of dose finding in partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity. Our simulations compare the proposed method with an approach that incorporates group information without considering late-onset toxicity. An alternative strategy could involve conducting independent parallel trials for each group; however, this approach risks dose reversals, where a more sensitive group is assigned a higher dose than a less sensitive group.
resultsIn comparison with a similar dose-finding method that does not incorporate late-onset toxicity, our proposed method shows similar performance in selecting the correct dose. Through an extensive simulation study, the generated results demonstrate good operating characteristics for the proposed method in terms of the proportion of correct dose selection within groups, while accounting for late-onset toxicities.
conclusionOur proposed method avoids dose reversals and demonstrates favorable operating characteristics in recommending appropriate doses for each group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.