ReviewHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
Nonneutralizing Antibodies in Haemophilia A Patients: To Be Ignored or Not to Be!
Review in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe existence of nonneutralizing antibodies (NNAs) to factor VIII (FVIII) unrecognized by the clot-based Bethesda assay has been widely accepted. They are reported both in haemophilia A (HA) patients without inhibitors and healthy controls, but are poorly studied.
aimThe article discusses the contradictory reports on the nature and clinical significance of NNAs. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionInitially defined as antibodies to non-functional domains of FVIII, recent studies have provided evidence for multi-domain specificities. Subclass analysis and affinity studies have shown evidence for distinct immune regulatory pathways which lead to antibody responses against FVIII in different groups. Their role in pharmacokinetics of FVIII is the most frequently studied, while few studies also indicate their possible role as biomarkers for future development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors). The impact of NNAs on the clinical severity of HA is largely elusive; however, they can cause difficulties in the interpretation of immunological tests. There is a need for longitudinal comprehensive studies in HA patients on the natural history of NNAs and also for clear guidelines for accurate diagnosis. Present review summarizes the data available on the prevalence of NNAs, their clinical impact and discusses directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.