Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216704›Full record

ReviewHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia

Nonneutralizing Antibodies in Haemophilia A Patients: To Be Ignored or Not to Be!

Shrimati Shetty, Anam Dhawlarker, Shruti Kharat, Kranti Patil, Gurpreet Kaur Saini, Fiza Jivani, Juili Bharankar, Shrinath Kshirsagar, Savita Rangarajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shrimati ShettyK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Anam DhawlarkerK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Shruti KharatK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Kranti PatilK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Gurpreet Kaur SainiK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Fiza JivaniK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Juili BharankarK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Shrinath KshirsagarK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Savita RangarajanK.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existence of nonneutralizing antibodies (NNAs) to factor VIII (FVIII) unrecognized by the clot-based Bethesda assay has been widely accepted. They are reported both in haemophilia A (HA) patients without inhibitors and healthy controls, but are poorly studied.

aimThe article discusses the contradictory reports on the nature and clinical significance of NNAs. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionInitially defined as antibodies to non-functional domains of FVIII, recent studies have provided evidence for multi-domain specificities. Subclass analysis and affinity studies have shown evidence for distinct immune regulatory pathways which lead to antibody responses against FVIII in different groups. Their role in pharmacokinetics of FVIII is the most frequently studied, while few studies also indicate their possible role as biomarkers for future development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors). The impact of NNAs on the clinical severity of HA is largely elusive; however, they can cause difficulties in the interpretation of immunological tests. There is a need for longitudinal comprehensive studies in HA patients on the natural history of NNAs and also for clear guidelines for accurate diagnosis. Present review summarizes the data available on the prevalence of NNAs, their clinical impact and discusses directions for future research.

Indexed as

AntibodiesFactor VIIIHemophilia AAntibodies, NeutralizingHumansAntibodiesAntibodies, NeutralizingFactor VIIIELISAfactor VIII binding antibodieshaemophiliainhibitors to factor VIIIneutralizing antibodiesNijmegen modified Bethesda assaynonneutralizing antibodies

Identifiers

PMID42216704
PMCPMC13551205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.