ArticleANZ journal of surgery
Older Patients' Recall of Goals of Care Discussions Following Emergency Abdominal Surgery.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Older Patients' Recall of Goals of Care Discussions Following Emergency Abdominal Surgery.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOlder patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are overrepresented and are at risk of poor postoperative outcomes that may not align with their goals. Goals of care (GOC) documentation remains low in older emergency laparotomy patients.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of emergency laparotomy patients aged ≥ 70 years between February 2024 and April 2025. Participants received phone follow-up 30 days after index surgery, assessing postoperative outcomes, EQ-5D-5L quality of life and decision satisfaction. If patients lacked capacity, next of kin were consented. Our primary aim was to assess recall of a preoperative GOC discussion. Our secondary aims were to correlate GOC recall with postoperative quality of life and decision satisfaction, and to determine rates of documented GOC conversations and GOC form completion.
resultsWe recruited 80 participants and completed follow-up in 75. Twenty-nine (39%) participants recalled discussing GOC preoperatively. Next of kin had higher recall than patients (n = 13, 59% and n = 16, 30% respectively). GOC recall was not associated with quality of life or decision satisfaction questionnaire scores. Most patients (n = 31, 89%) in the "GOC recall" group reported that the GOC conversation was worthwhile. Although 89% (n = 71) of participants had a completed GOC form preoperatively, 49% (n = 39) had a documented GOC discussion. We observed documentation inconsistencies, as participants with no GOC documentation recalled GOC discussions.
conclusionsGOC recall by older patients and their next of kin was low following emergency abdominal surgery. GOC discussions were valued by patients and next of kin, supporting further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.