ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Barriers for Secondary Hypertension Screening in the United States: A National Physician Survey.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension affects almost half of US adults and is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although expert guidelines recommend screening for secondary hypertension in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension and other high-risk groups, screening is conducted in <2% of candidates. This study aimed to determine barriers for secondary hypertension screening across US practices.
methodsPrimary care physicians, cardiologists, nephrologists, and endocrinologists, randomly selected from active members of the American Medical Association, were surveyed on barriers for secondary hypertension screening.
resultsResponse rate was 67% (425 of 633 response-eligible physicians). The leading reported barriers preventing secondary hypertension screening included visit time constraints (43.5%), poor ancillary support (29.4%), and testing-related logistics (27.5%). Primary care physicians were 10- to 17-fold less likely to be familiar with testing interpretation and subsequent steps than nephrologists and endocrinologists. Physicians in practices covered largely by Medicare were twice more likely to report poor ancillary support than physicians in practices covered primarily by private health insurance. Private practice physicians were more likely to report reimbursement concerns (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.6-7.7]) and poor ancillary support (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.6]) but also more likely to have access to specialists (adjusted odds ratio, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.2-13.5]) than physicians practicing in large medical groups.
conclusionsOur findings call for measures to address critical barriers in secondary hypertension screening. Strategies needed to facilitate personalized hypertension care include optimization of clinic visit duration, ancillary support, education initiatives, and timely access to specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.