ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Convergent Hybrid Ablation Versus Catheter Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: HALT AF Study Protocol and Rationale for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05411614 (A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Convergent Hybrid Ablation to Catheter Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Convergent Hybrid Ablation to Catheter Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenotype-Guided Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: From Rate Control to Catheter Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coexistence of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with greater morbidity and death than either condition alone. Catheter ablation improves outcomes in selected patients, yet results in persistent AF remain unsatisfactory. Convergent hybrid ablation may offer more durable rhythm control by integrating epicardial and endocardial techniques to achieve homogeneous, transmural pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation. However, randomized data comparing ablation strategies in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are lacking, leaving a critical evidence gap.
methodsHALT AF (Hybrid Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. A total of 120 patients with nonparoxysmal AF, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, and at least moderate left atrial dilatation undergoing first-time ablation will be randomized 1:1 to hybrid ablation or catheter ablation. All patients will receive preablation guideline-directed optimization and undergo strategically equivalent ablation (pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation). The primary efficacy end point is freedom from recurrent arrhythmia >30 seconds at 12 months and off class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs, excluding a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety end point is major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days. Secondary end points assess cardiac remodeling, biomarkers, symptoms, and quality of life.
conclusionsHALT AF will be the first randomized trial to compare convergent hybrid ablation and catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF and reduced left ventricular function. By enrolling only patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and dilated atria and by equating lesion sets, HALT AF is designed to provide critical evidence to inform rhythm-control strategies and guideline recommendations in this high-risk, underrepresented population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05411614.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.