Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216267›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026

Comparative Transcriptomics Suggests that Breast Secretory Epithelium Reuses Gene Repertoires Conserved Across Vertebrates Beyond Mammals.

Marie Saitou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marie SaitouDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-3217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of novel organs is often attributed to lineage-specific innovation; however, accumulating evidence suggests that many complex traits arise through the regulatory redeployment of conserved molecular components. From a molecular evolutionary perspective, an unresolved question is how preexisting gene repertoires are reorganized to generate tissue-specific functions. Here, we examine the molecular evolutionary organization of gene expression programs in human breast tissue by situating its transcriptome within a comparative framework of epithelial tissues with secretory functions. Using bulk RNA-seq data from the GTEx project, combined with co-expression network analysis, single-cell reference integration, and cross-vertebrate orthology assessment, we identify gene expression modules that are broadly shared across epithelial secretory tissues, relatively enriched in breast tissue, or biased toward female breast samples. We show that genes enriched in breast tissue are largely evolutionarily conserved across vertebrates and are embedded within transcriptional modules shared with other epithelial secretory organs. Co-expression analysis revealed partial overlap between breast modules and those of other epithelial secretory tissues, particularly in pathways related to secretion, vesicle trafficking, and extracellular matrix organization. Together, these results support a model in which breast secretory epithelium achieves tissue specialization through integration of conserved vertebrate gene repertoires, rather than through extensive emergence of mammal-specific genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMammary Glands, HumanTranscriptomeAnimalsEpitheliumFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMammalsVertebratesbreast tissuecomparative transcriptomicsepithelial secretory tissuesmodule preservationorgan evolutionvertebrate gene conservation

Identifiers

PMID42216267
PMCPMC13271094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.