Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216257›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2026

Scientists' Warning to Humanity: Unnecessary Bureaucracy Is a Global Impediment to Productivity, Advancement of Human and Planetary Wellbeing, Science and Sustainability.

Kenneth Timmis, Zeynep Ceren Karahan, Jennifer A Byrne, Jake M Robinson, Patricia Bernal, Paul B Rainey, Purificación López-García, Terry J McGenity, Max Chavarria, Kazuo Sato and 5 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kenneth TimmisInstitute for Microbiology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-4670
Zeynep Ceren KarahanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-3363
Jennifer A ByrneSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, & NSW Health Statewide Biobank, NSW Health Pathology, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8923-0587
Jake M RobinsonCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-3271
Patricia BernalDepartment of Microbiology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-0496
Paul B RaineyDepartment of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-5795
Purificación López-GarcíaEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-0651
Terry J McGenitySchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-8822
Max ChavarriaEscuela de Química, CIPRONA, Universidad de Costa Rica & Centro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas, San José, Costa Rica.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5901-3576
Kazuo SatoFaculty of Education, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Willy VerstraeteCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3140-3713
Lars M BlankInstitute of Applied Microbiology, Aachener Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Rup LalAcharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-8547
María Francisca ColomDepartment of Plant Production and Microbiology, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, & Institute for Sanitary and Biomedical Research of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-5429
Juan Luis RamosConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8731-7435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bureaucracies are essential to the proper functioning of almost all human activities. However, they are diverse in their quality and success-promoting potential. While many bureaucratic measures make sense and are necessary for the wellbeing and success of their organisations, some are unnecessary or ill-conceived/implemented, and yet others may harm system functioning and achievement. Unnecessary bureaucratic measures limit productivity, waste vital resources and drain workforces of engagement, enthusiasm, motivation, commitment and cohesion. (The term "unnecessary bureaucratic measures" used in this discourse is used in the sense of poor value and lacking a compelling basis-cost: benefit; see also GOV.UK 2020-but also includes poorly-conceived or -implemented measures, measures delegated to frontline and other workers that could/should be handled by the administrations, online tools promoted as reducing workloads but that in fact increase work and frustration because they are poorly designed and/or not subjected to adequate quality control.) They create frustration, anger and increased stress among those affected. Stress is considered by the World Health Organisation to be one of the foremost health crises of the 21st century. While the impact of unnecessary bureaucratic measures within an enterprise may go unnoticed by those not directly affected, the aggregate negative global impact on productivity, economic success and the wellbeing of workforces is concerning. Humankind is currently faced with a range of challenges, some existential, that urgently require solutions. Scientific research and discovery are generally considered to be major drivers of progress of humankind and a source of solutions to major problems and crises faced by society. Science innovation depends upon the creativity, originality and productivity of scientists. In the fields of biomedical sciences, the plant-agriculture-nutrition sciences, and the environmental sciences, progress in the past can be approximately quantified in terms of reduction in preventable human suffering, disease and premature death (as illustrated by the recent development of mRNA vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which saved millions of lives), as well as the resulting socio-economic benefits. Unnecessary bureaucratic measures needlessly slow down research progress by diverting the time and effort of scientists from their essential tasks-creative thinking and research-to mundane tasks, and are responsible for delays in humanitarian improvements that translate into avoidable suffering and premature loss of life. Unnecessary bureaucracy is a global crisis of diversion from primary essential tasks, lowered human achievement and ensuing frustration, that is intertwined with and reinforces other problems, such as societal fragmentation. It requires a global response. A new, fit-for-purpose framework is needed that supports the functioning of bureaucracies and the necessary measures they impose, while constraining the imposition of unnecessary measures. Here, we consider some of the causes of unnecessary bureaucracy and measures needed to directly address these causes. These considerations lead us to propose an actionable solution strategy involving a Bureaucracy Charter and an implementation mechanism that will ensure best practice and adherence to the Charter. The rationale of this strategy incorporates key issues of benchmarking-best practice, transparency-accountability, oversight, stakeholder engagement-involvement, duty of care, Health in All Policies, and awareness and avoidance of cost externalisations.

Indexed as

EfficiencyCOVID-19Global HealthHumans

Identifiers

PMID42216257
PMCPMC13239837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.