Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216253›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Flight of the dragons: a global review of migration in Odonata.

Johanna S U Hedlund, Myles Menz, Jason W Chapman, Alexander Hayward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna S U HedlundDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Infection Biology, Lund University, Ecology Building, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, SE-223 62, Sweden.
Myles MenzCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia.
Jason W ChapmanCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-4441
Alexander HaywardCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2018-01139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects are the most abundant and ecologically important animal migrants. Yet, we know relatively little about the patterns and processes underlying insect migration. Dragonflies (Anisoptera) and damselflies (Zygoptera) comprise the ancient insect order Odonata, whose ancestors were the first organisms to fly on Earth. Several members of Odonata are known to migrate long distances and have considerable impacts on ecosystems through biomass and nutrient transfer, pest control and species interactions. However, most aspects of odonate migration remain unknown and available data have not been fully reviewed from a global perspective in over two decades. This lack of consensus has repercussions on species monitoring, specialised conservation efforts and scientific progress. Here, we review odonate migration ecology, addressing: (i) what odonate migration is; (ii) why odonates migrate; and (iii) which odonate species migrate. We define two types of odonate migration: multi-generational migration, where back-and-forth migratory journeys are completed over several generations, and single-generational migration, where the same individuals leave and return to the original reproductive habitat. We conclude that within single-generational migration, altitudinal migration is currently the only known strategy, and we present the first complete list of species observed to perform this type of migration, where refuge is temporarily sought at high-altitude sites away from the reproductive habitat. In addition, we generate an exhaustive global list of 85 dragonfly and 15 damselfly species for which migration has been confirmed (total = 100 species) and a list of 85 possible migrants (22 damselfly species; 63 dragonfly species). Consideration of phylogeny suggests that migration has evolved multiple times within Odonata, and is present in four extant dragonfly families and two extant damselfly families. Approximately 1.5% of all odonate species are migratory, with the proportion rising to approximately 2.9% if species deemed to be possible migrants are also included. Thus, overall, migration is a relatively uncommon strategy in Odonata. Among dragonflies, the vast majority (73%) of migratory species occur in the Libellulidae with 62 confirmed migratory species, equating to 5.9% of all libellulids, whereas in damselflies, migrants are divided almost equally between Coenagrionidae (N = 8) and Lestidae (N = 7), with the genus Ischnura in Coenagrionidae having the most migrants of all damselfly genera (N = 5). Biogeographically, the proportion of migratory species is highest in the Palearctic (10.8%), followed by the Nearctic (6.8%), results that may reflect research bias or indicate that migration is an adaptation favoured at high latitudes. Interestingly, most odonate migrants appear to be species of 'Least Concern' according to the IUCN Red List and are potentially resilient to environmental change because of adaptations associated with their migratory strategy, such as opportunism, generalism and long-distance mobility.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationFlight, AnimalOdonataAnimalsanimal migrationdamselfliesdragonfliesdragonfly migrationentomologyinsect migrationmovement ecologyOdonata

Identifiers

PMID42216253
PMCPMC13542366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.