ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026
Informing low-risk drinking guidelines: a secondary, cross-sectional data analysis of alcohol use and health utility.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-risk drinking guidelines seldom incorporate quality of life (QOL). This secondary data analysis explores the relationship between drinking patterns and QoL.
methodsWe estimate the relationship between specific drinking behaviors and QoL, as measured by health utility, which reflects individuals' preferences for living in states of health. We use cross-sectional data from the US nationally representative National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III dataset. We modeled individuals' health utility as quadratic functions of the typical frequency of drinking and either the typical quantity consumed or the maximum quantity consumed on a single occasion in the past year. All analyses were limited to the target population for most low-risk drinking guidelines-current drinkers with no history of alcohol use disorder. All analyses were stratified by biological sex.
resultsFor females, health utility is concave in the frequency of consumption and decreasing in quantity. For males, the relationship is flatter, possibly increasing in frequency, and decreasing in quantity. Results suggest that the greatest health utility is associated with no more than 1 drink per day for women and no more than 3 drinks per day for men, and that, for both sexes, the greatest health utility is associated with drinking on fewer than 7 days per week.
conclusionsWhen the health utility of drinkers is considered, the optimal level of drinking is the same or less than many low-risk drinking guidelines. Although descriptive, our results suggest that accounting for drinkers' health preferences will reinforce current recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.