Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216218›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2026

A nomogram for assessing secondary infection risk in hospitalized patients with intestinal CRE colonization: a prospective cohort study.

Xiaoying Xie, Lijia Ni, Guanping Chen, Jiajian Guo, Xinlu Dai, Mingming Chen, Zhaofan Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoying Xie *Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Lijia Ni *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Guanping Chen *Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Jiajian GuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Xinlu DaiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Mingming ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Zhaofan LuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, China. luozhaofan@sysush.com.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515010089Shenzhen Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation JCYJ20240813150308012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the epidemiology, risk factors, and molecular characteristics of intestinal carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization and subsequent secondary infections in a hospital setting, and to develop a predictive model for risk stratification.

methodsA large-scale, unbiased active screening for intestinal CRE carriage was conducted among patients (including physical examination, outpatient, and inpatient populations) between August 31, 2021, and February 28, 2022. A prospective cohort design was used to follow colonized inpatients for six months. Clinical data were collected for univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for infection. A nomogram prediction model was constructed and validated. Homology between colonizing and infecting isolates was assessed using WGS and MALDI-TOF MS analysis.

resultsThe overall CRE colonization rate was 4.95% (475/9,615), with significant variation between inpatients (5.55%), outpatients (3.97%), and physical examination subjects (3.54%). Escherichia coli (49.05%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.95%) were the dominant species. The overall secondary infection rate among colonized inpatients was 5.04% (18/357), with the highest rates observed in the Rehabilitation (30.00%), ICU (21.88%), and Neurology (20.00%) departments. Multivariate analysis identified ICU stay ≥ 48 h, carbapenem exposure, fecal incontinence, and tracheostomy as independent risk factors, while admission to Rehabilitation was a protective factor. The prediction model demonstrated high discriminative ability (AUC = 0.960) in this single-center derivation cohort, but external validation is required before clinical application. Molecular analysis revealed that ST11 CRKP was the predominant clone (70%), and most infections (12/18) were genetically homologous to the patient's colonizing strain.

conclusionCRE intestinal colonization is prevalent across healthcare settings. The progression from colonization to infection is driven by specific clinical risks, which can be used to assess risk by our novel nomogram. These findings underscore the need for targeted screening in high-risk departments, enhanced antimicrobial stewardship, and focused surveillance on dominant clones like ST11 CRKP to effectively prevent CRE transmission and infection.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsIntestinesNomogramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)Intestinal colonizationRisk prediction modelSecondary infectionWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42216218
PMCPMC13491868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.