ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
Predictive value of primary tumor
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between primary tumor metabolic parameters on
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 157 patients with pathologically confirmed ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent
resultsAmong 157 patients (62 males and 95 females; mean age 56 ± 11 years), 71 patients (45.2%) had pathologically confirmed LNM. Patients with LNM exhibited evidently larger primary tumor size and higher SUVmax, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG than those without LNM (all P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed primary tumor size, SUVmax, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG were remarkedly associated with LNM. Multivariate analysis identified primary tumor size (OR: 1.043, 95%CI: 1.004-1.084; P = 0.032) and SUVmax (OR: 1.322, 95%CI: 1.159-1.532; P < 0.001) as independent predictors. The AUCs for tumor size, SUVmax, and combined factors were 0.76, 0.77, and 0.81, respectively. In addition, false-negative (OLNM-positive) cases showed markedly larger tumor size (P = 0.003) and higher TLG (P = 0.011) than true-negative cases.
conclusionMetabolic parameters of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.