ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Radius of proximal femur curvature as a significant predictor for long stem-canal match in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe match between femoral stems and the medullary canal is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly for long stems often used in complex primary and revision surgeries. This study aimed to investigate the association between the radius of proximal femur curvature (RPFC) on long stem-canal match in THA.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 65 patients who underwent revision or complex primary THA using a 200 mm long stem between June 2019 and June 2024 were analyzed. Preoperative CT scans were used to measure RPFC and bone volume fraction (BV/TV). Stem-canal match was assessed using postoperative radiographs. Multivariate logistic regression and ROC curve analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive value of RPFC for stem-canal match.
resultsSignificant differences in RPFC were observed between the match and mismatch groups (656.0 ± 198.9 mm vs. 401.4 ± 73.3 mm, p < 0.001). Height and gender also differed significantly between groups in univariate analysis. After adjusting for height and gender in a multivariate logistic regression model, RPFC remained an independent protective factor against stem-canal mismatch (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed an optimal RPFC cut-off value of 496.4 mm for predicting good stem-canal match (sensitivity: 94.4%, specificity: 85.1%, AUC = 0.923). Compared to height (AUC = 0.725) and gender (AUC < 0.7), RPFC demonstrated superior predictive value for stem-canal match.
conclusionRPFC is a significant predictor of long stem-canal match in THA. An RPFC < 496.4 mm is associated with a higher risk of mismatch for the implant used in this study. While these findings are promising, this is a single-center study with a limited sample size. Further, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these conclusions before widespread clinical adoption can be recommended. Preoperative RPFC measurement shows potential to improve implant selection and reduce mismatch-related complications in THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.