ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
Triple M overlap syndrome in the intensive care unit: differential diagnosis and management.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used as first-line therapy for various malignancies and are associated with a growing spectrum of immune-related adverse events. While many toxicities are managed in the outpatient setting, a clinically significant subset progresses to life-threatening multisystem disease requiring intensive care. Among these, the Triple M overlap syndrome, characterized by concurrent myasthenia gravis-like disease, inflammatory myositis, and myocarditis, represents the most severe and lethal phenotype encountered in critical care. MAIN TEXT: Triple M overlap syndrome presents unique diagnostic and management challenges in critically ill patients. Clinical features frequently overlap with sepsis, pneumonia, thromboembolism, and cardiopulmonary disease, creating significant diagnostic uncertainty. In addition, traditional diagnostic tools such as myasthenia gravis antibody testing and early cardiac imaging may be normal or nondiagnostic early in the disease course. This review focuses on the recognition and management of Triple M overlap syndrome in the intensive care unit. We highlight key diagnostic pitfalls, including the frequent under-recognition of occult myocarditis and the limitations of electrophysiologic and serologic testing. A structured ICU-oriented approach is proposed, emphasizing early multisystem evaluation with creatine kinase, serial troponins, electrocardiography, and cardiac imaging, alongside concurrent assessment for infection. Management strategies include prompt discontinuation of ICIs, early initiation of corticosteroids, and escalation to intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange for severe neuromuscular involvement. Cardiac complications require close monitoring and early immunosuppression. Targeted therapies such as abatacept are discussed in the context of myocarditis, with current evidence limited primarily to cardiac involvement. This review emphasizes a practical ICU-oriented framework incorporating parallel evaluation for immune-mediated toxicity and infection in critically ill patients.
conclusionTriple M overlap syndrome represents a high-risk and often underrecognized manifestation of ICI toxicity in critically ill patients. Early recognition, parallel evaluation for infection and immune-mediated disease, and coordinated multisystem management are essential to improving outcomes. Greater awareness and structured diagnostic approaches may reduce delays in treatment and associated mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.