Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216184›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2026

Does an app make patients happy? Impact of a novel medical history app on patient satisfaction in urgent care consultations in Germany: cluster-randomized interventional trial 'DASI'.

Eva Maria Noack, Kai Antweiler, Frank Müller, Dominik Schröder, Tim Friede, Eva Hummers, Lea Roddewig

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva Maria NoackDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany. evamaria.noack@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Kai AntweilerDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Frank MüllerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Dominik SchröderDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Eva HummersDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Lea RoddewigDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient satisfaction is an important indicator of healthcare quality. However, time constraints in primary care limit effective communication and history-taking. Digital medical history systems have the potential to improve the quality of medical consultations by enabling patient preparation and providing physicians with comprehensive pre-consultation information. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel medical history-taking app (DASI app) on patient satisfaction in out-of-hours practices (OOHP) in Germany.

methodsWe conducted a two-center, cluster-randomized trial over 12 months. Within each practice, weeks were randomized to either an intervention or control group, resulting in a cluster-randomized trial (CRT) with clustering in weeks within the same practice. Patients either used the DASI app before consultations (intervention group) or received standard care (control group). The DASI app is a patient-facing tool that guides patients through a dynamic questionnaire adapted to the selected complaints and previous answers. Patient satisfaction was measured using 17 items from the EUROPEP instrument covering relation and communication, medical care, and information and support. Additionally, we collected sociodemographic data. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests for individual items and t-tests for domain scores. Analyses were performed with R, version 4.5.2.

resultsAmong 1,460 approached patients, 1,040 (71%) were enrolled and 1,034 included in analyses. Patient median age was 31 years, with 60% female participants. Patients in the intervention group (n = 496) showed significantly better ratings in 12 of 17 EUROPEP items compared to controls (n = 538) and demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction across all three EUROPEP domains. Between 78 and 96% of patients rated care as excellent or very good, with intervention group patients more likely to select top-level evaluations in 9 of 17 items.

conclusionsDigital medical history taking significantly enhanced patient satisfaction in urgent care settings. The app likely improved satisfaction through multiple pathways including increased patient empowerment, better consultation preparation, and more efficient physician-patient interactions. These findings demonstrate that user-friendly digital tools can meaningfully enhance patient experience without disrupting existing workflows, supporting healthcare digitalization efforts while maintaining high-quality patient-centered care. TRAIL REGISTRATION: German register for clinical trials (DRKS00026659; date of registration: 2021-11-03).

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareMedical History TakingMobile ApplicationsPatient SatisfactionAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital healthEUROPEPHealthcare innovationMedical history takingOut-of-hours carePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42216184
PMCPMC13221757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.