Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216163›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Factors associated with the costs of treating privately insured adults with complicated urinary tract infections.

Kenneth Thorpe, Peter Joski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenneth ThorpeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Suite 656, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. kthorpe@emory.edu.
Peter JoskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Suite 656, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComplicated urinary tract infections (c-UTI) are expensive and frequently require hospitalization. This study estimated the impact of patient comorbidities, readmissions and treatment delay on the costs of complicated urinary tract infections in both inpatient and outpatient settings. A related aim is to provide the first estimates of the potential savings of treating patients currently treated as inpatients that have clinical characteristics similar to, though less complicated, to patients treated as outpatients.

designUsing one of the largest national claims data sets (30 million lives per year) on privately insured adults and dependents between 2019 and 2022, with regression models we estimate the treatment costs of complicated urinary tract infection (c-UTI) patients identified and treated in the hospital, identified and treated in an outpatient setting and identified in an outpatient setting but subsequently admitted. We statistically estimate potential savings associated with treating inpatient cases in the outpatient setting.

settingOur study was a retrospective analysis of claims data among privately insured adults and dependents with claims from February 1, 2019, to May 31,2022. Our analysis relies on the Merative- MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter database which is among the largest commercially insured set of claims data covering adults and dependents in the U.S. that included de-identified person-level claims data including inpatient, outpatient, and prescription drugs use and spending. It also included health plan spending, patient demographics, diagnosis, procedure and national drug codes covering more than 30 million active employees, early retirees, COBRA extenders, and dependents with data contributed by more than 160 employers and 40 health plans nationally each year.

participantsData were obtained for 93,228 c-UTI patients treated in both inpatient and outpatient settings in the United States.

resultsTreatment costs are highly positively skewed with a mean cost per episode of those identified in hospital of $42,000 and median cost of $27,784. High costs were in part linked to long lengths of stay for roughly 10% of patients of 15 days or longer. At the other extreme we found that many low-acuity patients were hospitalized. Switching antibiotics also increased treatment costs. The results show that 27% of c-UTI patients admitted to the hospital were low-acuity patients that potentially could be treated in an outpatient setting for over $31,000 per case less.

conclusionsThe results highlight several areas of opportunity to reduce dramatically the costs of treating c-UTI including treating currently hospitalized low-acuity patients without complications in an outpatient setting, reducing readmissions, and length of stay.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHospitalizationHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsComplicated urinary tract infectionHospitalizationsLow-acuity patientsReadmissionsTime to treat

Identifiers

PMID42216163
PMCPMC13430772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.