ArticleBMC public health2026
Recreational drug inhalation and socioenvironmental determinants of pulmonary infection in patients with HIV: a hospital-based case control study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality among people with HIV. Our objective was to evaluate common urban exposures among those living with HIV which may increase risk of pulmonary infection.
methodsWe enrolled 75 adult patients infected with HIV and admitted to San Francisco General Hospital into a hospital-based case-control study: 38 cases with pulmonary infection and 37 controls admitted for diagnoses other than pulmonary infection. We administered questionnaires to assess inhaled drug exposures, outdoor and indoor pollution, and occupational exposures. We fit multivariable logistic regression models with pulmonary infection as the dichotomous outcome and each exposure as a primary predictor in separate models, including potential confounders based on biological plausibility and backward selection criteria.
resultsParticipants were middle-aged (median age 48 years) and predominantly male (77%). Poverty was prevalent, with 79% unemployed and 27% unstably housed or homeless. Median CD4 count was lower in cases compared with controls (88 vs. 300 cells/µL, p = 0.005). Most cases were admitted with either bacterial pneumonia (76%) or Pneumocystis pneumonia (16%), and the most common admission diagnosis among controls was non-pulmonary infection (43%). 59% of participants had smoked tobacco cigarettes within the month prior to enrollment while 40% had recently smoked marijuana. In adjusted logistic regression models, tobacco smokers had six times higher odds of pulmonary infection (aOR 6.43, 95%CI 1.70-24.4) compared with non or former smokers, while those who had recently smoked marijuana experienced a 79% reduction in odds of pulmonary infection (aOR 0.21, 95%CI 0.06-0.78) compared with no recent marijuana smoking. Unstable housing or homelessness predicted a three-fold increased odds of pulmonary infection (aOR 3.22, 95%CI 1.01-10.3), whereas those sleeping on higher floors were at reduced odds of pulmonary infection, with each floor level above street-level predicting a 40% reduced odds of pulmonary infection (aOR 0.60, 95%CI 0.41-0.86). Finally, opening windows for ventilation was associated with reduced pulmonary infection odds (aOR 0.051, 95%CI 0.004-0.64).
conclusionsPulmonary infection odds were increased with tobacco smoking and homelessness; and decreased among recent marijuana smokers, those sleeping on higher floors and opening windows for ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.