ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Predicting facility delivery and its determinants among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia using machine learning algorithm: evidence from performance monitoring for action Ethiopia 2019 dataset.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFacility delivery attended by skilled health professionals is a critical strategy for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Despite substantial efforts to expand maternal health services in Ethiopia, a large proportion of births still occur at home. This study aimed to predict facility delivery and identify its associated factors among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia using machine learning approaches.
methodsThis study used secondary data from the 2019 Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Ethiopia cross-sectional household and female survey. A weighted sample of 5,413 women aged 15-49 years who had a recent birth was included in the analysis. Data extraction and preprocessing were conducted using STATA version 17, while machine learning models were implemented using Python version 3.11.5. Seven supervised machine learning algorithms were developed to predict facility delivery. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Data preparation included feature engineering, data splitting, handling missing values, addressing class imbalance, and outlier detection. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret the contribution of important predictors to model predictions.
resultsAmong the evaluated models, the Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving 74.15% accuracy, 72.58% recall, 76.27% F1-score, and 80.36% precision on test data. The most influential predictors of facility delivery included higher household wealth status, secondary or higher maternal education, television ownership, discussion of delivery location with a partner, partner encouragement for antenatal care attendance, family planning use, maternal age between 20 and 34 years, age at first sexual intercourse of 19 years or older, awareness of emergency contacts, and completion of primary education.
conclusionsInterpretable machine learning approaches can provide useful insights for identifying factors associated with facility delivery. The findings highlight key socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics that may inform targeted strategies to improve utilization of facility-based delivery services and support efforts to enhance maternal health outcomes in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.