ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Comparison of cardiac computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage thrombus detection.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a common intervention for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) are commonly used pre-PVI to assess left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus and visualize LA and pulmonary vein anatomy. This retrospective study aims to compare CCT and TEE in detecting LAA thrombus in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF scheduled for PVI.
methodsSeven hundred five patients underwent routine TEE and CCT within 24 h. Patients with prior LAA thrombus, cardioembolic stroke, or contraindications to TEE were excluded. The presence or absence of LAA thrombus and other potential thrombus-inducing factors were evaluated using TEE and CCT, and the diagnostic performance of the two imaging modalities was compared.
resultsMost patients had paroxysmal AF (54.2%) and a high CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (47.6%). TEE detected LAA thrombus in 1.8%, while 7% had SEC without thrombus. Cardiac CT scans showed LAA filling defects in 17.2%. Using TEE as the reference, CCT demonstrated high sensitivity (92.3%) and negative predictive value (99.8%), but low specificity (84.2%) and positive predictive value (9.9%) for LAA thrombus detection.
conclusionThe study supports CCT as a reliable imaging method for excluding LAA thrombus in AF patients scheduled for PVI. In cases where CCT shows no thrombus and adequate anticoagulation is ensured, catheter ablation and DCCV procedures can be safely considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.