Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42216096›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2026

Anticipating implementation: A mixed methods study of future prescribing determinants within an ongoing trial of clinical effectiveness.

Jennifer Kononowech, Allison Ranusch, Anne E Sales

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03625648 (CSP #2008 - Pentoxifylline in Diabetic Kidney Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03625648 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

CSP #2008 - Pentoxifylline in Diabetic Kidney Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2019 to 2030Enrolled2,376ConditionsDiabetic Kidney DiseaseArmsPentoxifylline, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer KononowechCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States. Jennifer.Kononowech@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9683-6739
Allison RanuschCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.
Anne E SalesCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) added implementation science teams to select trials to accelerate the uptake of research evidence into practice. CSP study #2008, "Pentoxifylline in Diabetic Kidney Disease", evaluates whether adding pentoxifylline to usual care reduces the incidence of end-stage renal disease and mortality in patients with diabetic kidney disease. This implementation science sub-study aims to develop a VA-wide implementation plan by identifying key implementation outcomes, identifying and interviewing key stakeholders, and identifying critical barriers and facilitators to implementing findings.

methodsUsing an exploratory sequential mixed methods approach in this hybrid type 1 design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with nephrologists, primary care physicians, and pharmacists from ten VA facilities that were enrolling Veterans in the CSP 2008 clinical trial. The interviews were analyzed using the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Disease (TICD) framework. Findings informed a web-based survey distributed to nephrologists, primary care physicians, and pharmacists from 15 additional participating facilities.

resultsInterviews identified five facilitators: 1) providers are willing to prescribe an older medication; 2) providers are not concerned about the side effects of pentoxifylline; 3) providers believe that pentoxifylline is inexpensive; 4) providers report widespread comfort with off-label prescribing; and 5) providers state they would be comfortable prescribing pentoxifylline if colleagues they trust recommend it. Survey data confirmed that providers are not concerned with prescribing an older medication, but there were mixed responses about off-label prescribing. Barriers included: 1) concerns about possible drug interactions; 2) providers self-identified as late adopters; 3) concerns about polypharmacy; 4) prescribers prefer newer drugs; and 5) providers want ample evidence that pentoxifylline works for this indication. Survey data confirmed all the identified barriers except for providers identifying as late adopters.

conclusionsInterview data provided early evidence of facilitators that may support pentoxifylline adoption if the trial shows positive results. Survey data reinforced and broadened these insights across a larger clinician sample. Together, these findings will guide development of targeted implementation strategies to support effective and timely dissemination of trial findings across the VA health system.

trial registrationThe CSP 2008 study ClinicalTrials.gov ID is NCT03625648.

Indexed as

Clinical trialCooperative studies programDepartment of veterans affairsDiabetic kidney diseaseImplementation sciencePrescribing

Identifiers

PMID42216096
PMCPMC13455494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.